Description
University of Sunderland
University of Sunderland
ENGM 116 Leadership and the Management of Project Risk, Quality and People
Assignment 2
Canvas (Turnitin) Submission Deadline: Thursday 6 th February 2025 by 2pm
Assignment 2
ENGM116 Assignment 2: Project Risk Management
Read and analyse the First Solar Case Study (provided)
Task 1: 50%
Identify three key risks that could impact on quality outcomes.
Justify and support your choice of risks by reference to the literature. For each risk:
- Build up the relevant risk specifications (see that attached template as a reminder of the field included in this)
- For each risk
- Justify your choice of impact and probability ratings.
- Explore the potential mitigation and contingency plans and consider the budgetary implications of these plans.
Task 2: 35%
Use two of the techniques covered in the module to explore one or more of these risks in more detail. Choose from: Pareto analysis, Riskit Analysis Graph, or the Ishikawa diagram. Justify your choice of techniques considering their relevance and identifying at which part of the risk management lifecycle they are of most value. Support your argument by making reference to relevant risk literature.
N.B. for this assignment you must explicitly state and justify any assumptions you have made in addition to the information provided in the case study.
The assignment should be submitted in report form with major sections matching the two tasks and minor sections matching the sub-tasks identified.
The assignment should be of 3000 words in length.
Citation and References List: 15%
- All literature that is cited in the report must be listed; any references listed must also be cited within the report.
- All references must be presented using formal Harvard Referencing style.
To receive a high quality, plagiarism and AI free solution, please contact us through WhatsApp +254716353533
Canvas (Turnitin) Submission Deadline: Thursday 6 th February 2025 by 2pm
Assignment 2
ENGM116 Assignment 2: Project Risk Management
Read and analyse the First Solar Case Study (provided)
Task 1: 50%
Identify three key risks that could impact on quality outcomes.
Justify and support your choice of risks by reference to the literature. For each risk:
- Build up the relevant risk specifications (see that attached template as a reminder of the field included in this)
- For each risk
- Justify your choice of impact and probability ratings.
- Explore the potential mitigation and contingency plans and consider the budgetary implications of these plans.
Task 2: 35%
Use two of the techniques covered in the module to explore one or more of these risks in more detail. Choose from: Pareto analysis, Riskit Analysis Graph, or the Ishikawa diagram. Justify your choice of techniques considering their relevance and identifying at which part of the risk management lifecycle they are of most value. Support your argument by making reference to relevant risk literature.
N.B. for this assignment you must explicitly state and justify any assumptions you have made in addition to the information provided in the case study.
The assignment should be submitted in report form with major sections matching the two tasks and minor sections matching the sub-tasks identified.
The assignment should be of 3000 words in length.
Citation and References List: 15%
- All literature that is cited in the report must be listed; any references listed must also be cited within the report.
- All references must be presented using formal Harvard Referencing style.
To receive a high quality, plagiarism and AI free solution, please contact us through WhatsApp +254716353533
